Skip to main content arrow-down arrow-tail-right arrow-triangle-right calendar camera compass download email eye facebook flag mail phone pin play send square-right tag twitter youtube badge message

Split Decision (Private Eye on the JCPC's judgment in Jay Chandler)

  • DPP in the Media
  • 23 Mar 2018

As reported in Private Eye Issue No.1466 (23 March- 5 April 2018)

Privy Council judges in London made the alarming decision last week not to allow an appeal by a prisoner facing execution in Trinidad – despite strong evidence that the man was suffering psychosis when he committed his crime and that, under international law, people with mental illness or disorders should never face the death penalty.

The judgement was so disturbing that two of the five judges on the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) took the highly unusual step of expressing their strong dissent. Lords Kerr and Lloyd-Jones said Jay Chandler, convicted of murder, should not pay the ultimate price of failings by his trial lawyers when he “plainly does have a viable defence on the grounds of diminished responsibility”.

The judges had heard that Chandler, now 39, was convicted and sentenced to death in 2011 for killing a fellow inmate in 2004 in bizarre circumstances in front of dozens of people in the jail’s exercise yard.

In neither of the two trials he faced (the first resulted in a hung jury) was the issue of his mental health raised. Yet when he was finally assessed by forensic psychiatrist Professor Nigel Eastman, who was brought in by the Death Penalty Project – it was found that Chandler was “more likely than not” suffering from psychosis at the time of the offence. That meant, under Trinidad & Tobago law, he was liable for manslaughter rather than murder and should not have faced the death penalty.

His counsel at both trials, Larry Williams, has repeatedly failed to say why, given Chandler’s medical history, there was no psychiatric assessment at the time and why diminished responsibility was never raised as a potential defence.

Nevertheless, Lord Carnwath, Lord Sumption and Lord Reed upheld the death penalty, saying: “There is no evidence that the failure to advance a case of diminished responsibility at the trial was anything other than deliberate.”

That, according to human rights lawyers, is worrying; not only for Chandler, but also for other mentally ill suspects facing the death penalty in countries where funding for mental health assessments is limited or unavailable. The majority decision flies in the face of not only international law, but also previous rulings by the JCPC itself.

One leading QC with years of Privy Council experience told the Eye: “This is the latest in a series of extraordinary decisions in death penalty appeals which appear to indicate that the current generation of judges no longer see their function as correcting gross breaches of human rights and due process in the Caribbean. It is a shameful judgement which scars the reputation of a court once respected for its integrity, consistency and humanity.”

Latest news

Caribbean Court of Justice strikes down mandatory death penalty in Barbados
Read More
Moving away from the death penalty in Zimbabwe - has the time come for change?
Read More
New opinion study shows Zimbabwean public ready to accept death penalty abolition
Read More
All prisoners serving life sentence in Belize to be re-sentenced following major decision of the Caribbean Court of Justice
Read More
Split Decision (Private Eye on the JCPC's judgment in Jay Chandler)
Read More
UK judges uphold death sentence of Trinidad prisoner despite him “more likely than not” having serious mental illness
Read More
Singapore public opinion survey reveals low support for the mandatory death penalty
Read More
Legal reform must be accompanied by legislative action if the death penalty is to be wiped out
Read More
The Slow Death of the Death Penalty in the U.S.A
Read More
Caribbean Court of Justice Considers Constitutionality of the Mandatory Death Penalty in Barbados
Read More
Trinidad Waits on British Judges' Death Row Ruling as Murders Soar
Read More
New Professional Resources Published on Mental Health in Capital Cases
Read More
Kenyan Supreme Court Declares Mandatory Death Penalty Unconstitutional
Read More
New Death Penalty Report Reveals Widespread Concern Among Former Supreme Court Judges About A Crisis in India's Criminal Justice System
Read More
Preaching to the Converted: Reflections on a Week in Australia
Read More
Why We Need To Do Away With The Death Penalty
Read More
Australia Must Continue to Campaign Against the Death Penalty in Our Region
Read More
Trinidad Court of Appeal Rehears Case of 10 Former Death Row Prisoners After Key Witness Testimony Retracted
Read More
Oral Statement to the 36th Session of the Human Rights Council
Read More

Stay up-to-date with our work