Skip to main content arrow-down arrow-tail-right arrow-triangle-right calendar camera compass download email eye facebook flag mail phone pin play send square-right tag twitter youtube badge message

Contradictions in Judicial Support for Capital Punishment in India and Bangladesh: Utilitarian Rationales

  • News
  • 18 Dec 2019

Article by Professor Carolyn Hoyle (Centre for Criminology, University of Oxford) and Saul Lehrfreund (Co-executive Director, The Death Penalty Project) published in the Asian Journal of Criminology.

This newly published article draws on two original empirical research projects that explore judges’ opinions on the retention and administration of capital punishment in India and Bangladesh. ‘Matters of Judgment’ was conducted by Project 39A (National Law University, Delhi, India) and ‘The Death Penalty Regime in Bangladesh: Exploring Perspectives of Former Judges’ by Dr Muhammad Mahbubur Rahman of The Faculty of Law at the University of Dhaka (Bangladesh) for the Bangladesh Institute of Law and International Affairs (BILIA). Both studies were undertaken in collaboration with the Death Penalty Project, in consultation with Professor Carolyn Hoyle (India and Bangladesh) and Dr. Mai Sato (India).

India and Bangladesh share a common history, and each has developed somewhat similarly since partition. However, while both countries now have relatively low murder rates, India has seen a decline in the rate of executions, while Bangladesh continues to impose death sentences and carry out executions at a higher rate. There have been legal challenges to the death penalty in India, restricting its use to exceptional cases. The same has not occurred in Bangladesh. Yet in both countries, systemic flaws in the criminal process are evident.

The data contained within these studies reveal justice systems marred by corruption, incompetence, abuses of due process, and arbitrary and inconsistent treatment of defendants from arrest through to conviction and sentencing. It shows that those with the power to sentence to death have little faith in the integrity of the criminal process.

Yet, a startling paradox emerges from these studies; despite personal knowledge of its flaws, judges have trust in the death penalty to deter crime and to realise other sentencing aims and feel retention benefits society. This is explained by reference to utilitarian values.

Not only did the majority of judges interviewed express strongly utilitarian justifications for sentencing people to death, in terms of their erroneous belief in its deterrent effect, but some also articulated utilitarian justifications for misconduct in pre-trial processes, suggesting that it was necessary to break the rules to secure convictions when the system was dysfunctional and ineffective.

The studies are the first of their kind in both jurisdictions – shedding new light on the administration of the law and pointing to a crisis within the Indian and Bangladeshi criminal justice systems.  A more detailed comparative report by Professor Carolyn Hoyle, providing a comprehensive analysis of each of these studies is forthcoming, and will be published by the Death Penalty Project in 2020.

Read the full article

Latest news

People may change mind about death penalty, but government?
Read More
Dismantle the gallows! Sierra Leone becomes the latest country to abolish the death penalty
Read More
Sentenced to death for killing her abusive ex-boyfriend as he attacked her: Aminata's story shows the importance of considering mitigating circumstances
Read More
New research revealing the attitudes of Indonesians towards the death penalty provides new data that could facilitate fresh discourse on the future of capital punishment in the country
Read More
A punishment reserved for the poor and marginalised? New study shines light on the profiles and experiences of death row inmates in Bangladesh
Read More
The Death Penalty Project at CogX Festival 2021
Read More
Guyana’s Court of Appeal will today hear a landmark case that could see the death penalty abolished
Read More
Lawyer: Popular support a flawed reason for death penalty in Japan
Read More
[JOINT STATEMENT] UN Crime Congress: abolition of the death penalty must be an integral part of crime prevention programmes and criminal justice reforms
Read More
Malaysian man has death sentence quashed as judgment in Singapore makes judicial history
Read More
British national received 24 strokes of the cane for drug offences in Singapore
Read More
New report finds Zimbabwean opinion leaders support abolition of the death penalty
Read More
Privy Council overturns murder conviction of unrepresented man who faced the death penalty in The Bahamas
Read More
Report on the views of opinion leaders on the reasons why the death penalty has not been abolished in the Eastern Caribbean and Barbados
Read More
Second Execution in Taiwan under President Tsai: Huge step backwards to Taiwan’s commitment to abolish the death penalty
Read More

Stay up-to-date with our work