Skip to main content arrow-down arrow-tail-right arrow-triangle-right calendar camera compass download email eye facebook flag mail phone pin play send square-right tag twitter youtube badge message

Death Sentence Quashed and Privy Council Rules Self-Induced Provocation Can Be A Defence to Murder

  • News
  • 13 Feb 2014

Daniel v The State

The appellant, Richard Daniel, was convicted in Trinidad and Tobago of a murder committed during the course of an attempted robbery. He was sentenced to death.  The Death Penalty Project assisted him in his application for appeal against conviction and sentence in December 2013 before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. Tim Owen QC and Raj Desai, barristers at Matrix Chambers were instructed pro bonoto represent Mr Daniel before the Privy Council. It was submitted on Daniel’s behalf that the defence of provocation should have been put before the jury, and that his mandatory death sentence was unlawful.

The prosecution had pursued cases of both murder and with felony murder – the latter being murder that is committed during the course of a violent offence, and operates regardless of whether there was any intention to kill.

Although the Privy Council found that there was no scope for any defence of provocation, self-induced or otherwise, to operate against felony murder, it confirmed that self-induced provocation can operate as a defence to murder.  This is so even where it was the defendant’s conduct that generated the deceased’s provocative conduct – in other words, even where the provocation was “self-induced”.

On the facts of this case, since there was no evidence that the appellant had at any time actually lost his self-control, a defence of provocation could not succeed.

Nonetheless, the Privy Council quashed the appellant’s capital sentence and substituted a term of life imprisonment.  It noted that, whilst a mandatory death sentence in the case of murder is lawful in Trinidad; in the case of felony murder, however, a death sentence is discretionary (See Nimrod Miguel v The State). Since it was not known whether the jury at trial convicted the appellant of murder or felony murder, his mandatory sentence of death could not stand.  In any event, it had been more than 5 years since the appellant had been placed on death row, and as such, no sentence of death – even a discretionary one – could be lawfully imposed now upon the appellant.  Hence the Privy Council substituted a sentence of life imprisonment.

 

Photo credit: Thomas Hawk (Flickr, Creative Commons), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/

Latest news

The Kalisher Trust Legal Internship - Applications now open
Read More
World Day Against the Death Penalty - Women and the Death Penalty
Read More
People may change mind about death penalty, but government?
Read More
Dismantle the gallows! Sierra Leone becomes the latest country to abolish the death penalty
Read More
Sentenced to death for killing her abusive ex-boyfriend as he attacked her: Aminata's story shows the importance of considering mitigating circumstances
Read More
New research revealing the attitudes of Indonesians towards the death penalty provides new data that could facilitate fresh discourse on the future of capital punishment in the country
Read More
A punishment reserved for the poor and marginalised? New study shines light on the profiles and experiences of death row inmates in Bangladesh
Read More
The Death Penalty Project at CogX Festival 2021
Read More
Guyana’s Court of Appeal will today hear a landmark case that could see the death penalty abolished
Read More
Lawyer: Popular support a flawed reason for death penalty in Japan
Read More
[JOINT STATEMENT] UN Crime Congress: abolition of the death penalty must be an integral part of crime prevention programmes and criminal justice reforms
Read More
Malaysian man has death sentence quashed as judgment in Singapore makes judicial history
Read More
British national received 24 strokes of the cane for drug offences in Singapore
Read More
New report finds Zimbabwean opinion leaders support abolition of the death penalty
Read More
Privy Council overturns murder conviction of unrepresented man who faced the death penalty in The Bahamas
Read More

Stay up-to-date with our work